1 Introduction
R. W. Satz discusses^{1} the fundamental motions of the physical universe from the point of view of the Reciprocal System of theory and derives their mathematical expressions. In a subsequent paper^{2} he shows how the work function, the ionization energy, and the magnetic resonance frequencies of the atoms and the subatoms can be theoretically derived from the fundamental postulates of the Reciprocal System. These two works form the starting point of the present paper.
The theory of the electric ionization and magnetization developed in References 1 and 2 leaves certain unresolved difficulties:
1.1 The mass effect of an electric charge.
Satz evaluates the energy necessary for creating a positive electric charge as 8.68 eV (Equation 7 of Reference 2 and page 8 of Reference 1). Larson, calculating the individual masses of the subatoms, concludes that the electric charge produces a mass effect amounting to 0.00004494 amu.^{3} This is equivalent to nearly 41850 eV. How such a mass effect of 41850 eV is produced from an electric charge that came into being from an energy of 8.68 eV is not clear. Similarly, it can be seen that the energy associated with the unit isotopic charge is 2.17 eV, since its rotational frequency is R/2π (page 8, Reference 1). It is once again not clear how this can compare with the mass effect of an isotopic charge, namely, 931.3 MeV. Further, I have shown^{4} that, following Larson’s line of argument, a unit magnetic charge gives rise to a negative mass effect equivalent to 243.19 eV, which also contrasts with the energy required to create a magnetic charge, namely, 2.17 eV as derived by Satz.
1.2 Magnetic Rotation
Under Table I (page 23, Reference 2), Satz mentions in a footnote: “…where value 3 appears in magnetic rotation, this is the inverse of actual rotation,” whereas in the work^{5} from which these values were taken, Larson was more careful, noting that “…where the value 3 appears as the magnetic rotation of one of the higher group elements, this is the inverse of the actual rotation, 5.” However, what both these authors fail to make clear is how rotation 5 is the inverse of rotation 3, since in the magnetic dimension the two “zero points” are separated by 4 units and not 8.
1.3 Photoionization
The photoionization theory developed by Satz^{2} seems to give good results, but there are certain inadequate features. The first of these is the rather large discrepancy (16 to 19%) between the calculated and the observed values of the ionization energy of some of the elements. See, for example, the cases of C, Zn, Cd, Hg, etc. (Table I, pages 2223, Reference 2).
1.4
The appropriateness of taking the magnetic speed as 3 (see Table I, page 23, Reference 2) when the magnetic displacement is 3, in the cases of Ni, Cu, Zn, Zr, Nb and Mo or that of taking the electric speed as 5 and 6 when the electric displacement is (4) and (3) respectively in the cases of Ge and As is not explained. This lapse occurs in the cases of Hf, Ta, W, Re, Os, Ir, Pt, Au, Hg, Tl, Pb, Bi, etc.
1.5
While Table I^{2} covers a good number of the elements for which the calculated values of the work function and the ionization energy are compared with the observed values, there is a considerable number of elements left out. Conspicuous among the latter are all of the inert gases.
1.6
Similarly, while it was mentioned that the electron, the positron, the proton, and H^{1} can take an electric charge (page 23, Reference 2), no reason was given as to why the neutrino and the neutron do not do so.
1.7
In the case of H^{1} the Principle of Equivalence was invoked (page 24, Reference 2) to show that the ionization energy is 13.595 eV. However, no attempt was made to derive this value, from the rotational speeds of H^{1}, even though this was done in the case of the ionization energies of the free positron and proton (Equation 7, Reference 2), as well as atoms (Equation 9a, Reference 2).
1.8
Developing the equation for the ionization energy of an atom, Satz writes: “From mechanical considerations it is obvious that the energy necessary to create a positivenegative charge pair is twice that needed to create the negative charge on the electron” (page 24, Reference 2). Thus he takes it as 2 × 2.1 = 4.34 eV. But it can be asked, why should not this energy be taken as twice the energy needed to create the positive charge on the atom (2 × 8.68 eV), or the sum of the energies required to create the negative and the positive charges (2.17 + 8.68 eV), instead of 4.34 eV?
2 Equation for the Ionization Energy
We will now attempt a refinement of the electrical ionization theory developed by Satz^{2} with a view to meet the difficulties mentioned in section 1 above.
We find ths test way to get an insight into the situation is to consider the ionization energies, E_{I}, of the atoms of the alkali metals, all of which have only one unit of rotational displacement in the electric dimension. From the Handbook of Chemistry,^{6} We have the following data:
Element 
Displacement 
E_{I} in eV 

Li 
211 
5.392 
Na 
221 
5.139 
K 
321 
4.341 
Rb 
331 
4.177 
Cs 
431 
3.894 
It can be noted from me observational data that as the displacement in the magnetic dimension increases, there is a systematic decrease in the ionization energy. On the other hand, the value calculated by Satz (his Table I, Reference 2) is the same, 4.34 eV, for all of these elements. From this it is apparent that there ought to be some missing factor that accounts for this discrepancy. This factor, whose existence has not been recognized hitherto, is what might be called the transverse effect of the rotations in the two dimensions other than the one considered in the Satz Equation 9a (page 25, Ref. 2):
$E_{I,atom} = 4.34 \times \left( \frac{c}{v_{mag}} \right)^{1/2} eV$
$E_{I,atom} = 4.34 \times \left( \frac{c}{v_{elec}}  1 \right)^{1/2} eV$
That is to say, if u and v are the two magnetic speeds and w the electric speed, and if the ionization energy happens to be given by
$E_{I} = 4.34 \times \left( \frac{c}{u} \right)^{1/2}$
the speeds v and w in the orthogonal dimensions do have a transverse effect on E_{I}. Or if E_{I} happens to be given by
$E_{I} = 4.34 \times \left( \frac{c}{w}  1 \right)^{1/2}$
then the speeds u and v exert the transverse effect.
This transverse effect can be evaluated as follows. Firstly, we note from Satz’s Equation 9a^{2} given above that the collinear effect of the atomic rotation on the electric ionization is arrived at by considering the inverse speed c/v_{mag} or c/v_{elec}. The transverse effect is the inverse of the collinear effect, and as such, is to be arrived at by considering the specific speeds, namely, v_{mag}/c and v_{elec}/c directly.
Secondly, since speeds in two different dimensions are simultaneously involved in the transverse effect, their net effect can be calculated by taking their geometric mean.^{7} Incidentally, it may be noted that the reason for the geometric mean of the specific rotations to be the relevant quantity, as Larson takes, is that the force effect of a specific rotation t is given by ln(t) (i.e., the natural logarithm of t), and that the average force due to the two rotations t_{1} and t_{2} is
$\frac{1}{2} \left( ln(t_1)+ln(t_2) \right ) = ln(t_1 \times t_2)^{1/2}$
That is, it is equivalent to the force effect of a rotation (t_{1}× t_{2})^{1/2}.
Finally, the squareroot of the expressions is to be taken in order to convert the time region quantity into the timespace region quantity. Thus the factor responsible for the transverse effect can be written down as
$\left[ \left( \frac{v_x}{c} \times \frac{v_y}{c} \right )^{1/2} \right ]^{1/2} = \left( \frac{v_x \times v_y}{c^2} \right )^{1/4}$ 
(1) 
where v_{x}/c and v_{y}/c are the specific rotations in the other two dimensions.
It is necessary to consider one more item before we can set up the final expression for the ionization energy of the atom. This concerns the energy required to create a positivenegative charge pair, mentioned in section 1.8 above. This is not twice the energy needed to create the negative charge as Satz supposes (nor, of course, twice the energy needed to create the positive charge). In Reference 1, Satz concludes that the natural frequency of electric charge is R/π Hertz (his Equation 23, Reference 1) and then shows that the frequency of unit negative charge is R/2π, since the negative charge is one unit of time displacement and its speed is 1/(1 + 1) = 1/2. Similarly, he shows that since the unit of positive electric charge is a unit of space displacement, its speed is (1 + 1)/1 = 2, its frequency is 2R/π (also see his Equations 4 & 7, Reference 2). Now, when a charge pair is created the relevant speed is the geometric mean (of the speeds of a positive and negative charge), that is, (1/2 × 2)^{1/2} = 1. Hence the energy necessary to create the charge pair is twice h × 1 × R/π (where h is Planck’s constant), or 8.68 eV. Therefore, the energy for the first ionization level is given by
$E_{I,atom} = 8.68 \times \left( \frac{c}{v_{mag}} \right )^{1/2}\times \left( \frac{v_x \times v_y}{c^2} \right )^{1/4} eV$ 
(2) 
3 Observational Validation
In Table II are listed the values of E_{I} calculated from Equation (2). In column 2 of the Table the displacements in the three dimensions are given for each element, and in the third column are given the rotations causing the collinear effect, namely, either c/v_{mag} or c/v_{elec}. In those cases where these speeds are derived from any of the alternative orientations the atomic rotation is able to assume, as will be presently discussed, they are marked by an appropriate sign. In the fourth column are listed the two specific rotations that produce the transverse effect. In column 5 are listed the calculated values and the observed values according to Reference 6.
The agreement with the observational values can be seen to improve very materially compared with that achieved by the Satz equation. (The correlation coefficient is 0.992.) There are several aspects to the computation:
3.1 The Neutral Particles.
As pointed out in section 1.6 above, the neutrino and the neutron do not take any electric charge. I have shown elsewhere^{4} that the “½ ½” type of effective displacement in both the magnetic dimensions of these particles is what makes the acquirement of an electric charge impossible.
3.2 Hydrogen.
One of the two intermediate type of particles, H^{1}, has the following speeds in its two rotating systems:
$$\begin{Bmatrix}
\frac{1}{3}\frac{1}{2}\frac{2}{1} \\ \frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{2}\frac{2}{1}
\end{Bmatrix}$$
Since the speeds in the two rotating systems in the primary magnetic dimensions are unequal, their geometric means, $\sqrt{1/3 \times 1/2} = 1/\sqrt{6}$ is to be taken. This causes the collinear effect. The transverse effect comes from the two speeds 1/2 and 2 in the remaining two dimensions. Thus, from Equation (2) we have:
$E_{I,H^1} = 8.68 \times (\sqrt{6})^{1/2} = \left( \frac{1}{2} \times 2 \right )^{1/4} = 13.585 eV$
3.3 The Inert Gases.
A typical case is that of the inert gases, all of which have zero electric displacement. It must be recalled that the positive and negative zeropoints (from either of which the atomic rotation can be alternatively reckoned) are separated by 8 (or 16) displacement units in the electric dimension.^{8} Now for the purpose of taking on the electric charge the rotation in the electric dimension of the inert gases is able to assume the role of this alternative zeropoint. We shall refer to this phenomenon by the term “zeroshifting.”
Both He and Ne, with their smaller atomic numbers (net total electric displacement), are able to take the double leap of 16 units (two 8unit shift). This has been indicated in Table II by ¶¶. Kr, Xe and Rn, with higher atomic numbers, take on the 8unit zeroshift (indicated in Table II by ¶). Ar, the element next to Ne in the inert gas series, is also able to take on the 16unit zeroshift like both of its predecessors. But its net total displacement being much higher than that of He or Ne, the probability of the 16unit shift competes equally with that of the 8unit shift resorted to by Kr and the higher members.
We will find in a number of instances where alternative atomic rotational orientations are possible, as will be seen below, the question of the relative probabilities plays a significant role in determining the value of the ionization energy observed macroscopically. Pending detailed study of the relative probabilities we will assume that the 16unit shift and the 8unit shift have equal probabilities in the case of Ar. Thus the ionization energy of Ar comes out to be the arithmetic mean of the two values resulting from the 16unit shift and the 8unit shift, namely, 15.92 eV.
3.4 Electronegative Elements.
From the principles of the Reciprocal System it is evident that positive ionization—that is, acquisition of a rotational vibratory space displacement—of the atom is not possible because of the space displacement in the electric dimension of these elements. The rotation in the electric dimension must assume an alternative orientation, thereby acting as an equivalent time displacement. This alternative orientation may be achieved by any of the following three expedients.
3.4.1 The first expedient is to revert to the allpositive equivalent displacement.
Thus, for example, Ni, with the usual displacement of 3 3 (8) can assume the equivalent displacement 3 2 10. This allpositive displacement is not normally realized due to its lower probability. This possibility, therefore, occurs only when the element belongs to the highest position in Division III (see pp. 2234, Reference 3)—near the border between Divisions II and III. In fact, it is encountered in only one more case, that of Lu (4 4 (15)).
3.4.2
If the rotation in the electric dimension is involved only in the transverse effect, another possibility opens up. In view of the spacetime symmetry around unity, a speed n can achieve the effect of inverting the spacetime orientation of the rotation by its ability to act in the capacity of its reciprocal, namely, the speed 1/n. But this ability to act as its reciprocal is limited only to the transverse effect and cannot extend to the collinear effect, since the transverse effect is an inverse effect itself. Thus, in the case of Au (4 4 (7)), for example, the speed 8 in the electric dimension is able to act as speed 1/8 as far as the production of the transverse effect is concerned. This type is indicated in Table II by §. Other examples are Cu, Pd, Ag, Cd, and Hf. The probability of this type of alternative configuration becomes very low as we move away from the middle of a Group.
3.4.3
Under these circumstances, none of the elements of Division IV nor any of those in the lowest positions in Division in are able to take up this expedient The negative rotation in the electric dimension of these elements is, however, able to achieve the same result by taking recourse to the expedient of zeroshifting mentioned in section 3.3.
As an example, let us consider the element Se with the displacement 3 3 (2). An 8unit zeroshift in orientation turns the space displacement (2) into the time displacement 6, which then is able to produce the collinear effect. It must also be noted that the inversion of the orientation effected by the zeroshifting enables the rotation to exert either the collinear effect or the transverse effect with equal facility. In the example of Se cited above, the two effects seem to have equal probabilities. The macroscopic result, once again, is that the ionization energy required is the arithmetic mean of the two values.
It will be seen that this alternative of zeroshifting is invariably the expedient adopted by all the elements of Division IV (and those of Division m nearer the border between Divisions III and IV), of Groups 2B, 3A, 3B and 4A. In the case of Group 4A elements Ta (4 4 (14)) through Pt (4 4 (8)) the 8unit zeroshift is not feasible, since the existing space displacement in the electric dimension is greater than 8 units. These elements, therefore, take the 16unit zeroshift. It is worth noting that in the case of the elements S (3 2 (2)), Se (3 3 (2)), Os (4 4 (10)), Ir (4 4 (9)) and Pt (4 4 (8))—in all of which the electric displacement is at the bottom of the first or second 8unit stretch—the positive rotation effectuated by zeroshifting seems to act either in the collinear or in the transverse capacity with equal probability.
This leaves the Division IV elements of Group 2A, which have some peculiarity arising out of their low net total displacement These elements, N, O and F do resort to the zeroshifting, like the rest of their electronegative family, but, by virtue of their low net total displacements they are able to take on the 16unit double shift, like the two inert gas elements, He and Ne, that bracket their group. In fact, the probabilities of the 16unit and 8unit shifts are about the same for each of these elements.
4 The Special Cases.
There remain two special cases in which the large discrepancy between the calculated and the observational values of the ionization energy seems to warrant further study .

The first of these pertains to those elements with displacement 3 in their electric dimension, irrespective of whether this displacement is the direct positive value of 3, or the equivalent positive displacement 3 obtained by an 8unit zeroshifting of the negative displacement of 5. They are Al (2 2 3), Sc (3 2 3), Ga (3 3 (5)), Y (3 3 3), In (4 3 (5)) and La (4 3 3). The exceptions are B (2 1 3) at the low atomic number end, and Tl (4 4 (5)) and Ac (4 4 3) at the high atomic number end. The calculated value, in these cases, exceeds the observational value by about 15 to 35%, as shown in Table I below.
Table I: Cases of Large Discrepancy
Element 
Calculated 
Observed 
Discrepancy (%) 

Al 
8.08 
5.986 
35.0 
Sc 
7.52 
6.54 
14.9 
Ga 
7.52 
5.999 
30.7 
Y 
7.52 
6.38 
17.8 
In 
7.11 
5.786 
22.9 
La 
7.11 
5.577 
27.5 

The second special case pertains to the electropositive elements of Group 4A, namely, the Lanthanides from Ce (434) through Tb (4311). The average calculated value of the ionization energy for these elements is 7.87 eV, while the average observational value is 5.62 eV.
Table II: Ionization Energy of the Elements

Specific Speed 
E_{I} in eV 


Element 
Displacement 
c/v_{m} 
c/v_{e} 
Trans. Eff. 
Calculated 
Observed 
H 
M ll(l) 






M ½½(1) 
√6 

1/2 * 2 
13.585 
13.598 
He 
210 

17¶¶ 
1/2.5 * 1/1.5 
24.95 
24.587 
Li 
211 

2 
1/3 * 1/2 
5.55 
5.392 
Be 
212 
3 

1/2 * 1/3 
9.61 
9.322 
B 
213 
3 

1/2 * 1/4 
8.94 
8.298 
C 
214 

5 
1/3 * 1/2 
11.09 
11.260 
N 
22(3) 

14¶¶ 
1/3 * 1/3 
18.07 




6¶¶ 
1/3 * 1/3 
11.21 




Av. 

14.64 
14.534 
O 
22(2) 

15¶¶ 
1/3 * 1/3 
18.75 




7¶ 
1/3 * 1/3 
12.28 




Av. 

15.51 
13.618 
F 
22(l) 

16¶¶ 
1/3 * 1/2.5 
20.31 




8¶ 
1/2.5 * 1/2.5 
14.52 




Av. 

17.42 
17.422 
Ne 
220 

17¶¶ 
1/2.5 * 1/2.5 
21.96 
21.564 
Na 
221 

2 
1/3 * 1/2.5 
5.25 
5.139 
Mg 
222 

3 
1/2.5 * 1/2.5 
7.76 
7.646 
A1 
223 
3 

1/3 * 1/4 
8.08 
5.986 
Si 
224 
3 

1/2.5 * 1/4.5 
8.21 
8.151 
P 
32(3) 

6¶ 
1/4 * 1/3 
10.43 
10.486 
S 
32(2) 

7¶ 
1/2.5 * 1/4 
11.96 



4 

1/2.5 * 1/7¶ 
8.49 




Av. 

10.22 
10.360 
Cl 
32(l) 
8¶ 

1/2.5 * 1/4 
12.91 
12.967 
Ar 
320 

17¶¶ 
1/4 * 1/3 
18.65 






13.19 






15.92 
15.759 
K 
321 

2 
1/4 * 1/3 
4.66 
4.341 
Ca 
322 

3 
1/4 * 1/3 
6.60 
6.113 
Sc 
323 
3 

1/4 * 1/4 
7.52 
6.54 
Ti 
324 
3 

1/4 * 1/5 
7.11 
6.82 
V 
325 
3 

1/4 * 1/6 
6.79 
6.74 
Cr 
326 
3 

1/3.5 * 1/7 
6.76 
6.766 
Mn 
327 
4 

1/3 * 1/8 
7.84 
7.435 
Fe 
328 
4 

1/2.5 * 1/9 
7.97 
7.870 
Co 
329 
4 

1/2.5 * 1/9.5 
7.86 
7.86 
Ni 
33(8) 
4 

1/2.5 * 1/10.5+ 
7.67 
7.635 
Cu 
33(7) 
4 

1/2.5 * 1/7.5§ 
7.67 
7.726 
Zn 
33(6) 
4 

1/4 * 1/3¶ 
9.33 
9.394 
Ga 
33(5) 

4¶ 
1/4 * 1/4 
7.52 
5.999 
Ge 
33(4) 
4 

1/4 * 1/51 . 
8.21 
7.899 
As 
33(3) 

6¶ 
1/4 * 1/4 
9.70 
9.81 
Se 
33(2) 

7¶ 
1/3.5 * 1/3.5 
11.36 



4 

1/3.5 * 1/6.5¶ 
7.95 




Av. 

9.66 
9.752 
Br 
33(l) 

8¶ 
1/4 * 1/3.5 
11.87 
11.814 
Kr 
330 

9¶ 
1/3.5 * 1/3.5 
13.12 
13.999 
Rb 
331 

2 
1/4 * 1/4 
4.34 
4.177 
Sr 
332 

3 
1/4 * 1/4 
6.14 
5.695 
Y 
333 

4 
1/4 * 1/4 
7.52 
6.38 
Zr 
334 
4 

1/4 * 1/5 
8.21 
6.84 
Nb 
335 
4 

1/4 * 1/6 
7.84 
6.88 
Mo 
336 
4 

1/4 * 1/7 
7.55 
7.099 
Tc 
337 
4 

1/4 * 1/8 
7.30 
7.28 
Ru 
338 
4 

1/3.5 * 1/8.5 
7.43 
7.37 
Rh 
339 
4 

1/3.5 * 1/9.5 
7.23 
7.46 
Pd 
43(8) 
5 

1/3.5 * l/8.5§ 
8.31 
8.34 
Ag 
43(7) 
4 

1/4.5 * 1/7.5§ 
7.20 
7.576 
Cd 
43(6) 
4 

1/5 * 1/3¶ 
8.82 
8.993 
In 
43(5) 

4¶ 
1/5 * 1/4 
7.11 
5.786 
Sn 
43(4) 
4 

1/5 * 1/5¶ 
7.76 
7.344 
Sb 
43(3) 
5 

1/4 * 1/6¶ 
8.77 
8.641 
Te 
43(2) 
5 

1/3.5 * 1/6.5¶ 
8.89 
9.009 
I 
43(l) 

8¶ 
1/5 * 1/4 
10.86 
10.451 
Xe 
430 

9¶ 
1/4.5 * 1/3.5 
12.32 
12.130 
Cs 
431 

2 
1/5 * 1/4 
4.12 
3.894 
Ba 
432 

3 
1/5 * 1/4 
5.80 
5.212 
La 
433 

4 
1/5 * 1/4 
7.11 
5.577 
Dy 
4312 
4 

1/5 * 1/13 
6.11 
5.93 
Ho 
4313 
4 

1/5 * 1/14 
6.00 
6.02 
Er 
4314 
4 

1/5 * 1/15 
5.90 
6.10 
Tm 
4315 
4 

1/4.5 * 1/15.5 
6.01 
6.18 
Yb 
4316 
4 

1/4.5 * 1/16.5 
5.91 
6.254 
Lu 
44(15) 
4+ 

1/5 * 1/18+ 
5.64 
5.426 
Hf 
44(14) 
5 

1/4.5 * 1/14.5§ 
6.83 
7.0 
Ta 
44(13) 

4¶¶ 
1/4.5 * 1/4.5 
7.09 
7.89 
W 
44(12) 

5¶¶ 
1/5 * 1/4.5 
7.97 
7.98 
Re 
44(ll) 
5 

1/5 * 1/6¶¶ 
8.29 
7.88 
Os 
44(10) 

7¶¶ 
1/5 * 1/5 
9.51 



5 

1/5 * 1/7¶¶ 
7.98 




Av. 

8.74 
8.7 
Ir 
44(9) 

8¶¶ 
1/5 * 1/5 
10.27 



5 

1/4.5 * 1/7.5¶¶ 
8.05 




Av. 

9.16 
9.1 
Pt 
44(8) 


1/5 * 1/5 
10.98 



5 

1/5 * 1/9¶¶ 
7.49 




Av. 

9.23 
9.0 
Au 
44(7) 
5 

1/5 * 1/8 § 
7.72 



5 

1/5 * 1/2¶ 
10.91 




Av. 

9.31 
9.225 
Hg 
44(6) 
5 

1/4.5 * 1/2.5¶ 
10.60 
10.437 
T1 
44(5) 

4¶ 
1/5 * 1/5 
6.72 
6.108 
Pb 
44(4) 

5¶ 
1/5 * 1/5 
7.76 
7.416 
Bi 
44(3) 
5 

1/5 * 1/6¶ 
8.29 
7.289 
Po 
44(2) 
5 

1/4.5 * 1/6.5¶ 
8.35 
8.42 
Rn 
440 

9¶ 
1/5 * 1/5 
10.98 
10.748 
Ra 
442 

3 
1/5 * 1/5 
5.49 
5.279 
Ac 
443 

4 
1/5 * 1/4.5 
6.90 
6.9 
Th 
444 

5 
1/5 * 1/5 
1.16 
6.95 
Note:
+ Alternative allpositive displacement
§ Inverse electric speed (in transverse effect only)
¶ 8unit zeroshift (in the electric dimension)
¶¶ 16unit zeroshift
1 Satz, R. W., “Further Mathematics of the Reciprocal System,” Reciprocity X(3), 1980.
2 Idem, “Photoionization and Photomagnetization,” Reciprocity XII(1), Winter 198182.
3 Larson, Dewey B., Nothing But Motion, North Pacific Publishers, Portland, Or., 1979, p. 163.
4 K.V.K. Nehru, “Internal Ionization and Secondary Mass,” privately circulated paper.
5 Larson, The Structure of the Physical Universe, North Pacific Publishers, Portland, Or., 1959, p. 119.
6 J. A. Dean, ed., Lange’s Handbook of Chemistry, 1973, pp. 36 to 38.
7 Larson, Dewey B., “Solid Cohesion,” Reciprocity XII(1), Winter 198182, p. 15.
8Idem, Nothing But Motion, p. 222.